Only 22% of companies are addressing child labour concerns in the supply chain, while only 23% are actively tackling climate change.
The results of a new survey of business executives makes for sobering reading, given that there are more than 150 million children engaged in child labour around the world, and that scientists are predicting environmental Armageddon if carbon reduction targets are not met 보스베이비 더빙 다운로드.
Only 28% of those surveyed are addressing gender equality in their supply chains, with just 32% actively ensuring they aren’t sourcing from areas affected by conflict and violence wooxy 다운로드. Despite this, just 2% of respondents thought their companies had irresponsible supply chains.
The report, authored by the Economist Intelligence Unit for Standard Chartered, interviewed 100 respondents from each of China, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and the US 코레일 다운로드. The majority of respondents came from companies with turnover of more than US$500mn.
The research shows that where companies are addressing supply chain responsibility, they are going for the low-hanging fruit fifa 19 pc 다운로드.
60% are tackling workplace safety, which is considered relatively easy to monitor (however, it’s obviously a welcome trend, in the wake of disasters such as the Rana Plaza fire in Bangladesh) 애드블록 플러스 다운로드. 55% are looking to waste reduction and recycling, while 50% are addressing working hour limits.
The relative failure to address more pressing and potentially catastrophic concerns speaks to how difficult they are to tackle: eradicating child labour from your supply chain is more costly than ensuring there’s a recycling bin in each office 새천년체조 다운로드. But the message of the report is: there’s no excuse.
“Multinational firms are the architects of global supply chains. As such they must deal with the shifting economic, technological, political and social forces and pressures operating on their supply chains, employees, customers and regulators 쿵야 캐치마인드 다운로드. It is not much of an exaggeration to say that their ability to navigate and respond will be one (perhaps the) decisive factor for the future of a reasonably integrated and sustainable global economy,” says Nobel Prize winning economist Michael Spence of the University of New York, in a note accompanying the report windows 7 trial.
This sentiment extends to trade finance banks and other financial institutions. Just 27% of executives cited banks as an important influence on their responsible supply chain policy, with just 20% citing stock exchanges (one wonders how many would change their tune if stock prices were concretely affected by irresponsible sourcing) rjava 다운로드.
However, in interviews of influential business figures conducted along with the report, it emerged that banks are considered to have a good deal of potential to either support, incentivise or hamper responsible conduct civil war 다운로드. “Financial stakeholders are missing opportunities to positively influence supply chain responsibility,” the report reads.
The findings tie in with research conducted by Westpac at an event in September 2016. More than 100 people were quizzed at GTR‘s Asia Trade & Treasury Week in Singapore in September, with just 12% thinking that financial institutions “have the most responsibility in driving sustainable trade”.
This was a surprising total, given the amount of focus banks’ PR teams and industry bodies put on their sustainability efforts. The message from both pieces of research is clear: banks and companies must do better, when it comes to sustainable supply chain. Read the full report from the EU here
First published at www.gtreview.com